Citation context dataset · Updated 2025-12-01
Claim-to-Source Evidence Map
This map makes each inline evidence link inspectable beside the article section and passage in which it appears. It is designed to expose what is sourced, what kind of source is used, and where editorial or medical review is still needed.
What the map establishes
43 of 43 articles are mapped. Every evidence guide has at least one passage connected to an external research or guidance link.
142 citation contexts are downloadable. Repeated use of one source creates separate rows when it supports separate passages; isolated source-list links are excluded.
43.7% include detected caution language. This is a reproducible text signal, not a judgment that the remaining passages are overstated.
Mapped articles
43/43
Citation contexts
142
Coverage
100%
How to read a row
- Claim context reproduces the visible Markdown passage containing the inline citation.
- Section records the nearest preceding H2 so readers can evaluate the statement in context.
- Source class is assigned from the source domain; it does not rate study design or evidentiary strength.
- Caution-language signal detects terms such as “association,” “limited,” “may,” and “does not prove.” It does not substitute for expert review.
Citation contexts by source class
| Group | Items | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Research Record Or Publication | 77 | 54.2% |
| Background Or Institutional Source | 25 | 17.6% |
| Government Or Public Health Guidance | 25 | 17.6% |
| Professional Or Ethics Guidance | 15 | 10.6% |
Download the complete evidence map
The CSV contains the article, category, section, citation label, surrounding claim context, source URL and domain, source class, caution-language signal, and medical-review status for every detected contextual evidence link. Standalone reading-list entries are excluded because they do not identify a neighboring claim.
What this dataset does not prove
A mapped citation is not confirmation that the source supports every word in the passage, that the study is high quality, or that all important claims in the article are cited. The map is an editorial accountability tool and review queue. All current articles remain labeled editorial review only unless their pages identify a completed qualified medical review.
