The Stories That Keep Doctors Near Přerov Up at Night

The ethics of acting on clinical premonitions present a dilemma that medical ethics has not addressed—and that Physicians' Untold Stories raises implicitly for readers in Přerov, Moravia. A physician who orders an additional test because of a "feeling" is, strictly speaking, practicing outside the evidence-based framework. But if the test reveals a life-threatening condition that would otherwise have been missed, the physician's decision is retrospectively justified—not by the evidence-based framework but by the outcome. This creates an ethical tension between process (following evidence-based protocols) and result (saving the patient's life).

Dr. Kolbaba's collection includes accounts where physicians navigated this tension in real time, making clinical decisions based on premonitions and then constructing post-hoc rational justifications for their choices. For readers in Přerov, these accounts raise important questions: Should clinical intuition be incorporated into medical decision-making? If so, how? And who bears the responsibility when a premonition-based decision leads to a negative outcome? These are questions that the medical profession will eventually need to address, and Physicians' Untold Stories provides the clinical case material for that conversation.

Every account of a medical premonition in Physicians' Untold Stories involves a physician making a choice: to act on the premonition or to ignore it. In Přerov, Moravia, readers are discovering that this choice—and the courage it requires—is one of the book's most compelling themes. A physician who acts on a premonition is acting without data, without protocol, and without professional cover. If the premonition proves correct, the physician may never tell anyone how they really knew. If it proves incorrect, the physician has ordered unnecessary tests, delayed other care, or deviated from standard practice without justification.

Dr. Kolbaba's collection documents physician after physician making this choice—and the emotional texture of their accounts reveals that the decision to act on a premonition is rarely easy. The physicians describe anxiety, self-doubt, and the fear of appearing irrational, alongside the urgency and conviction that the premonition generates. This internal drama—the conflict between training and experience, between professional norms and personal knowing—is what gives the book's premonition accounts their particular emotional power and what readers in Přerov find most relatable.

The phenomenon of clinical premonition—a physician's inexplicable foreknowledge of a patient's condition or trajectory—is one of medicine's most closely guarded secrets. In Přerov, Moravia, Physicians' Untold Stories is pulling back the curtain on this phenomenon, revealing that physician premonitions are far more common, more specific, and more clinically significant than the profession has publicly acknowledged. Dr. Kolbaba's collection includes accounts from multiple specialties and settings, demonstrating that the clinical premonition is not confined to a particular type of physician or clinical environment.

What makes these accounts particularly compelling is their verifiability. Unlike premonitions reported in non-clinical settings, medical premonitions often generate documentation: chart entries, lab results, imaging studies, and outcome records that can be compared to the physician's reported foreknowledge. Several accounts in the book describe situations where physicians documented their intuitions before the predicted events occurred—creating a real-time record that eliminates retrospective bias. For readers in Přerov, this documentation transforms the premonition accounts from anecdotes into something approaching clinical evidence.

The medical premonition phenomenon documented in Physicians' Untold Stories gains additional significance when viewed alongside research on "near-death experiences" (NDEs) and "shared death experiences" (SDEs). NDE research by Sam Parnia (AWARE study), Pim van Lommel (Lancet study, 2001), and Raymond Moody has established that patients who survive cardiac arrest sometimes report veridical perceptions—accurate observations of events that occurred while they were clinically dead. Shared death experiences, documented by Moody and William Peters, involve living individuals who share aspects of a dying person's experience—seeing the light, feeling the peace, encountering the deceased.

For readers in Přerov, Moravia, this convergence of evidence is important: premonitions, NDEs, and SDEs all suggest that consciousness can operate beyond the brain's normal spatiotemporal constraints. The physician premonitions in Dr. Kolbaba's collection represent the "before" dimension of this expanded consciousness (knowing before events occur); NDEs represent the "beyond" dimension (consciousness during clinical death); and SDEs represent the "shared" dimension (consciousness extending between individuals). Together, these phenomena paint a picture of human consciousness that is far richer and more mysterious than the materialist model allows—and that the medical profession is only beginning to investigate seriously.

Dean Radin's presentiment research program at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) represents the most systematic scientific investigation of precognitive phenomena to date—and provides essential context for the physician premonitions documented in Physicians' Untold Stories. Radin's experiments, spanning two decades and published in journals including the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Frontiers in Psychology, and Explore, employ a consistent methodology: participants are exposed to randomly selected emotional and calm images while physiological indicators (skin conductance, heart rate, pupil dilation, brain activity via fMRI) are measured. The key finding, replicated across multiple studies and independent laboratories, is that physiological responses to emotional images begin several seconds before the images are displayed.

This "pre-stimulus response" has been confirmed by meta-analyses—most notably a 2012 meta-analysis by Julia Mossbridge, Patrizio Tressoldi, and Jessica Utts published in Frontiers in Psychology, which analyzed 26 studies from seven independent laboratories and found a statistically significant overall effect. For readers in Přerov, Moravia, this research means that the physician premonitions in Dr. Kolbaba's collection are consistent with laboratory findings: if the body can respond to future emotional events under controlled conditions, it is plausible that physicians—whose professional lives involve constant exposure to emotionally charged events—might experience amplified versions of this effect. The book's clinical accounts and Radin's laboratory data converge on the same conclusion: the human organism has some capacity to anticipate future events.

A 2014 survey published in the American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine found that among hospice workers, 46% had witnessed at least one instance of a dying patient reaching out to an unseen presence, and 30% had observed patients engaging in coherent conversations with individuals who were not visibly present. These findings are not outliers — they are confirmed by similar studies from the United Kingdom, Japan, and India, suggesting a universal phenomenon rather than a cultural artifact.

For healthcare workers in Přerov who have witnessed these events, the academic validation matters deeply. Many have carried these memories in silence, fearing that disclosure would cost them credibility. Dr. Kolbaba's book serves as a bridge between private experience and public acknowledgment, giving medical professionals permission to name what they have seen.

The emotional toll of witnessing unexplained phenomena is a recurring theme in Physicians' Untold Stories, and one that deserves careful attention. Physicians in Přerov are trained to process death within a clinical framework: the patient's condition deteriorated, interventions were attempted, and ultimately the body's systems failed. This framework, while medically accurate, provides no vocabulary for the physician who watches a deceased patient's spouse appear in the room moments after death, or who feels an overwhelming sense of peace and love flooding the space around a dying patient. Without a framework, these experiences can leave physicians feeling isolated, confused, and even frightened.

Dr. Kolbaba's book serves a crucial function by normalizing these experiences — not in the sense of explaining them away, but in the sense of assuring physicians that they are part of a well-documented phenomenon experienced by thousands of their colleagues. For physicians practicing in Přerov, this normalization can be profoundly liberating. It allows them to integrate these experiences into their professional and personal lives rather than compartmentalizing them as aberrations. And for patients and families in Přerov, understanding that their physicians may be quietly carrying these transformative experiences can deepen the already profound trust between doctor and patient.

Přerov's first responders and law enforcement personnel encounter death in contexts that are often sudden, violent, and traumatic — circumstances that are very different from the hospice and hospital settings described in most of Physicians' Untold Stories. Yet the book's core message — that there is more to death than its physical appearance — can be profoundly healing for those who witness its most difficult forms. For police officers, firefighters, and EMTs in Přerov who carry the images of the deaths they've attended, the possibility that those who died may have experienced something peaceful and welcoming, despite the external circumstances, can offer a measure of comfort that no debriefing protocol can provide.